Transdermal patches (adhesive patches placed on the skin) may also be used to deliver a steady dose through the skin and into the bloodstream. Testosterone-containing creams and gels that are applied daily to the skin are also available, but absorption is inefficient (roughly 10%, varying between individuals) and these treatments tend to be more expensive. Individuals who are especially physically active and/or bathe often may not be good candidates, since the medication can be washed off and may take up to six hours to be fully absorbed. There is also the risk that an intimate partner or child may come in contact with the application site and inadvertently dose himself or herself; children and women are highly sensitive to testosterone and can suffer unintended masculinization and health effects, even from small doses. Injection is the most common method used by individuals administering AAS for non-medical purposes. 
The interface for Glow is very similar to Impression and that is the crux of the details. I love the way both products are controlled and deliver the almost impossible results to achieve any other way. But… The interface, and especially the start up is very slow compared to all of the other Topaz Lab products. The issue we now have (given all of the Topaz Lab filters) is to take the end-result concept you have in your head and figuring out your workflow to get there. Yes, there are many alternative paths but I suspect you will need to develop experience with each and understand how they all work with each other’s effects. Glow is an asset in my photo-editing tool box and allows me to do things to an image I thought was not possible. That said, it’s a bit like being a kid in a candy store; so many options and only so much time… Was this helpful?